Abstract
Despite a growing interest in adolescent subjective well-being, cross-cultural research on positive and negative affect in adolescents has been surprisingly scarce. Moreover, a cross-cultural evaluation of affective well-being measures in adolescents has lagged behind research in adults. The present study evaluated the cross-national and gender invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), using adolescent samples from 32 countries (N = 17,489; age range = 14–19) spanning five continents. The original two-factor structure of the SPANE was supported in 29 of the 32 countries. We could establish partial metric invariance of the SPANE across countries and full or partial scalar invariance across gender in 18 and 11 countries, respectively. The alignment method showed evidence for approximate invariance across countries, allowing for cross-national means comparisons of positive and negative affect. In most countries, girls reported higher levels of negative affect, and no substantial gender differences in positive affect were observed. Cross-national differences in mean levels of positive and negative affect yielded complex findings. Our results suggest that the SPANE is a solid candidate for measuring emotional experiences among adolescents in large-scale cross-national studies.


Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All materials, including datasets and analysis syntaxes can be found at: https://osf.io/wg7ae/.
Notes
The Children’s Worlds study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic on samples of 7–15-year-old children included the same set of six items for measuring affective well-being.
References
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210
Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 13(6), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379023
Batz, C., & Tay, L. (2018). Gender differences in subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
Batz-Barbarich, C., Tay, L., Kuykendall, L., & Cheung, H. K. (2018). A meta-analysis of gender differences in subjective well-being: Estimating effect sizes and associations with gender inequality. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1491–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774796
Bazhydai, M., Ivcevic, Z., Brackett, M. A., & Widen, S. C. (2019). Breadth of emotion vocabulary in early adolescence. Imagination Cognition and Personality, 38(4), 378–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618765403
Blanchflower, D. G., & Bryson, A. (2024a). Well-being rankings. Social Indicators Research, 171, 513–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03262-y
Blanchflower, D. G., & Bryson, A. (2024b). The gender well-being gap. Social Indicators Research, 173, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03334-7
Bowen, N. K., & Masa, R. D. (2015). Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: A guide for social work researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 6(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/681607
Brauer, K., Ranger, J., & Ziegler, M. (2023). Confirmatory factor analyses in psychological test adaptation and development: A nontechnical discussion of the WLSMV estimator [Editorial]. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 4(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000034
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application. Psicothema, 29(4), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.178
Campbell, O. L. K., Bann, D., & Patalay, P. (2021). The gender gap in adolescent mental health: A cross-national investigation of 566,829 adolescents across 73 countries. SSM - Population Health, 13, Article 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100742
Casas, F., & González-Carrasco, M. (2021). Analysing comparability of four multi-item well-being psychometric scales among 35 countries using children’s worlds 3rd wave 10 and 12-year-olds samples. Child Indicators Research, 14, 1829–1861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09825-0
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Choi, E., & Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E. (2017). The relationship between momentary emotions and well-being across European Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1210571
Courtney, M. G. R., Hernández-Torrano, D., Karakus, M., & Singh, N. (2023). Measuring student well-being in adolescence: Proposal of a five-factor integrative model based on PISA 2018 survey data. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00170-y
Das, K. V., Jones-Harrell, C., Fan, Y., Ramaswami, A., Orlove, B., & Botchwey, N. (2020). Understanding subjective well-being: Perspectives from psychology and public health. Public Health Reviews, 41(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5
Davis, R. C., Arce, M. A., Tobin, K. E., Palumbo, I. M., Chmielewski, M., Megreya, A. M., & Latzman, R. D. (2022). Testing measurement invariance of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in American and Arab university students. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(2), 874–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00411-z
de Jesús Cardona-Isaza, A., González Barrón, R., & Montoya-Castilla, I. (2025). Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Experiences Scale (SPANE) in Colombian adolescent offenders. Trends in Psychology, 33, 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00255-7
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
du Plessis, G. A., & Guse, T. (2017). Validation of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in a South African student sample. South African Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246316654328
Esidio, E. C., França, M. T. A., & Frio, G. S. (2023). Differences between genders in the subjective well-being of students participating in PISA 2018. Child Indicators Research, 16, 1781–1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10034-0
Fischer, R., & Rudnev, M. (2025). From MIsgivings to MIse-en-scène: The role of invariance in personality science. European Journal of Personality, 39(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070241283081
Gallup. (2015). 2015 global emotions. Gallup, Inc.
Gallup. (2022). Gallup global emotions 2022. Gallup, Inc.
Gallup. (2023). Gallup global emotions 2023. Gallup, Inc.
Gallup. (2024). Gallup global emotions 2024. Gallup, Inc.
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and meanings. Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford University Press.
Han, K., Colarelli, S. M., & Weed, N. C. (2019). Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000731
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., List, J. M., Puryear, C., Drabble, R., & Lindquist, K. A. (2022). From text to thought: How analyzing language can advance psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(3), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211004899
Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2020). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: Analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 23(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w
Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2021). Subjective health in relation to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(3), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318820104
Jovanović, V. (2015). Beyond the PANAS: Incremental validity of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in relation to well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.015
Jovanović, V., Adams, S., Al Banna, M. H., Aritio-Solana, R., Aryanto, C. B., Avsec, A., Bakhshi, A., Bender, M., Berjot, S., Betancourth Zambrano, S., Brajša-Žganec, A., Broche-Pérez, Y., Buzea, C., Cabello, R., Carreca, V., Cassibba, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., Daemi, F., Díaz-Guerra, D. D., … Zotović-Kostić, M. (2025). Adolescent self-construal across cultures: Measurement invariance of the Aspects of Identity Questionnaire-IV in 30 countries. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 35, e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70017
Jovanović, V., Lazić, M., Gavrilov-Jerković, V., & Molenaar, D. (2020). The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE): Evaluation of measurement invariance and convergent and discriminant validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000540
Jovanović, V., Joshanloo, M., Martín-Carbonell, M., Caudek, C., Espejo, B., Checa, I., Krasko, J., Kyriazos, T., Piotrowski, J., Rice, S. P. M., Junça Silva, A., Singh, K., Sumi, K., Tong, K. K., Yıldırım, M., & Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. (2022). Measurement invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience across 13 countries. Assessment, 29(7), 1507–1521. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211021494
Jovanović, V., Rudnev, M., Iqbal, N., Rice, S. P. M., & Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. (2022). Cross-cultural measurement of positive and negative emotions in adolescence: Evidence from three countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(7), 3143–3160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00521-6
Kluger, J. (2024, June 25). People are less stressed now than they were before the pandemic. Time.
Kormi-Nouri, R., Farahani, M. N., & Trost, K. (2013). The role of positive and negative affect on well-being amongst Swedish and Iranian university students. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(5), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.823511
Kyriazos, T. A., Stalikas, A., Prassa, K., & Yotsidi, V. (2018). A 3-faced construct validation and a bifactor subjective well-being model using the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience, Greek version. Psychology, 9, 1143–1175. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.95071
Lee, S. T. H., Hartanto, A., Yong, J. C., Koh, B., &Leung, A. K.-y. (2020). Examining the cross‐cultural validity of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12390
Li, F., Bai, X., & Wang, Y. (2013). The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE): Psychometric properties and normative data in a large Chinese sample. PloS One, 8(4), Article e61137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061137
Lomas, T., Padgett, R. N., Lai, A. Y., Pawelski, J. O., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2025). A multidimensional assessment of global flourishing: Differential rankings of 145 countries on 38 well-being indicators in the Gallup World Poll, with an accompanying principal components analyses of the structure of flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 20(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2024.2370538
Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441
Maassen, E., D’Urso, E. D., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Nuijten, M. B., De Roover, K., & Wicherts, J. M. (2023). The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000624
Marquez, J., Casas, F., Taylor, L., & De Neve, J-E. (2024). Economic development and adolescent well-being in 139 countries. Child Indicators Research, 17, 1405–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10131-8
Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Nagengast, B., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Dicke, T. (2018). What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000113
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppelman, L. (1971). Manual: Profile of Mood States. Educational and Industrial Testing Service Inc.
Meisenberg, G., & Woodley, M. A. (2015). Gender differences in subjective well-being and their relationships with gender equality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(6), 1539–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9577-5
Melios, G., Laffan, K., Kudrna, L., & Dolan, P. (2023). Les misérables: An analysis of low SWB across the world. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1107939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107939
Meuleman, B., Żółtak, T., Pokropek, A., Davidov, E., Muthén, B., Oberski, D. L., Billiet, J., & Schmidt, P. (2023). Why measurement invariance is important in comparative research. A response to Welzel et al. (2021). Sociological Methods & Research, 52(3), 1401–1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221091755
Miyamoto, Y., Ma, X., & Wilken, B. (2017). Cultural variation in pro-positive versus balanced systems of emotions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.014
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Muthén & Muthén.
Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480042
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Dialectical responses to questions about dialectical thinking. American Psychologist, 55(9), 1067–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.9.1067
Pethtel, O., & Chen, Y. (2010). Cross-cultural aging in cognitive and affective components of subjective well-being. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018511
Pokropek, A. (2024). Comparability and measurement invariance. In I. Tomescu-Dubrow, C. Wolf, K. M. Slomczynski, & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Survey data harmonization in the social sciences (pp. 323–332). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119712206.ch18
Prado-Gascó, V., Romero-Reignier, V., Mesa-Gresa, P., & Górriz, A. B. (2020). Subjective well-being in Spanish adolescents: Psychometric properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences. Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104011
Rahm, T., Heise, E., & Schuldt, M. (2017). Measuring the frequency of emotions-validation of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in Germany. PloS One, 12(2), Article e0171288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171288
Raudenská, P. (2020). The cross-country and cross-time measurement invariance of positive and negative affect scales: Evidence from European Social Survey. Social Science Research, 86, Article 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102369
Rees, G., Savahl, S., Lee, B. J., & Casas, F. (Eds.). (2020). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 35 countries: A report on the Children’s Worlds project, 2016-19. Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB).
Rice, S. P. M., & Shorey-Fennell, B. R. (2020). Comparing the psychometric properties of common measures of positive and negative emotional experiences: Implications for the assessment of subjective well-being. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 4, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-020-00025-1
Robitzsch, A., & Lüdtke, O. (2023). Why full, partial, or approximate measurement invariance are not a prerequisite for meaningful and valid group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 30(6), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2023.2191292
Rudolf, R., & Bethmann, D. (2023). The paradox of wealthy nations’ low adolescent life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24, 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00595-2
Ryff, C. D. (2003). Corners of myopia in the positive psychology parade. Psychological Inquiry, 14(2), 153–159.
Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., & Bel-Bahar, T. S. (2014). Human attribute concepts: Relative ubiquity across twelve mutually isolated languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036492
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2002). Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism? Cognition and Emotion, 16(6), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000590
Singh, K., Jain, A., Kaur, J., Junnarkar, M., & Slezackova, A. (2016). Cross-cultural differences on Gunas and other well-being dimensions. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.09.001
Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Jaswal, S. (2016). Validating the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in India. Mental Health Religion & Culture, 19(8), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1229289
Tong, K. K., & Wang, Y. Y. (2017). Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in a Chinese community sample. PloS One, 12(8), Article e0181616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181616
Tov, W., Keh, J. S., Tan, Y. Q., Tan, Q. Y., & Aziz, I. A. S. B. (2022). Assessing subjective well-being: A review of common measures. In W. Ruch, A. B. Bakker, L. Tay, & F. Gander (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology assessment (pp. 38–57). Hogrefe.
Tsai, J. L., & Clobert, M. (2019). Cultural influences on emotion: Established patterns and emerging trends. In D. Cohen, & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 292–318). The Guilford Press.
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2021). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Wedderhoff, N., Gnambs, T., Wedderhoff, O., Burgard, T., & Bošnjak, M. (2021). On the structure of affect: A meta-analytic investigation of the dimensionality and the cross-national applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 229(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000434
Weidong, Z., Jing, D., & Schick, C. J. (2004). The cross-cultural measurement of positive and negative affect examining the dimensionality of PANAS. Psychological Science (China), 27(1), 77–79.
Wilken, B., & Miyamoto, Y. (2018). Dialectical emotions. In J. Spencer-Rodgers, & K. Peng (Eds.), The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism (pp. 509–546). Oxford University Press.
World is angry and stressed, Gallup report says (2019, April 26). BBC.
Yaaqeib, S., Lambert, L., Hadjisolomou, S., Al-Fazari, M., Selim, H., & Haque, A. (2022). Validation study of a well-being scale (SPANE) in the Arab Gulf region: A multi-country study. PloS One, 17(5), Article e0268027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268027
Yang, Y., Harkness, J. A., Chin, T. Y., & Villar, A. (2010). Response styles and culture. In J. A. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T. P. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. P. Mohler, B. E. Pennell, & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (pp. 203–223). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
York, R., & Bell, S. E. (2014). Life satisfaction across nations: The effects of women’s political status and public priorities. Social Science Research, 48, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.05.004
Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., & Rinck, C. M. (1983). Multiple Affect Adjective Check List–Revised (MAACL-R) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06153-000
Zuckerman, M., Li, C., & Diener, E. F. (2017). Societal conditions and the gender difference in well-being: Testing a three-stage model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216684133
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the participants for taking part in the study.
Funding
The study is financially supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, GRANT No. 1520 (Project title: Identity orientations and mental health in adolescence: Examining the roles of basic psychological needs and culture – IDIOMATIC). The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency supported the work of Andreja Avsec, Tina Kavčič, and Gaja Zager Kocjan (research core funding numbers P5-0110 and P5-0062). Marta Kowal was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) START scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Veljko Jovanović contributed to Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; Vesna Gavrilov-Jerković, Milica Lazić, Vojana Obradović, Dušana Šakan, Aleksandar Tomašević, and Marija Zotović-Kostić, contributed to Funding Acquisition, Investigation, and Writing – Review & Editing; Sabirah Adams, Rebeca Aritio Solana, Christ Billy Aryanto, Andreja Avsec, Ali Bakhshi, Michael Bender, Sophie Berjot, Sonia Betancourth Zambrano, Andreja Brajša-Žganec, Yunier Broche-Pérez, Carmen Buzea, Rosario Cabello, Rosalinda Cassibba, Judith Cavazos-Arroyo, Fatemeh Daemi, Diego D. Díaz-Guerra, Marija Džida, Mona Eidelsburger, Pablo Fernández-Berrocal, Evelyn Fernández-Castillo, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, Tomasz Frackowiak, Teresa Freire, Biljana Gjoneska, Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo, Md Jamil Hossain, Jessie Hillekens, Stefan Höfer, Tareq Mahmud, Naved Iqbal, Szilvia Jámbori, Mohsen Joshanloo, Ljiljana Kaliterna Lipovčan, Tina Kavčič, Marta Kowal, Marija Krstevska Taseva, Kwok Kit Tong, Denisse Manrique-Millones, Alessia Mariano, Michal Misiak, Pasquale Musso, Javier Ortuño Sierra, Ioana Orzea, Ahmet Özaslan, Joonha Park, Marija Pašić, Rasa Pilkauskaitė Valickienė, Rogelio Puente-Díaz, Lizbeth Puerta-Sierra, Gordana Ristevska Dimitrovska, S. Craig Roberts, Puji Tania Ronauli, Shazly Savahl, Danielius Serapinas, Sok Ian Kuan, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Piotr Sorokowski, Dijana Sulejmanović, Mst Sadia Sultana, Sze Man Yuen, Erzsébet Szél, Henri Tilga, Wenceslao Unanue, Jesús Unanue, Marieke van Egmond, Murat Yıldırım, Gaja Zager Kocjan, and Laura Zamarian contributed to Investigation and Writing – Review & Editing.
All authors have agreed to the final submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad (Approval Code: 02-313/4 − 1: Approval Date: May 16, 2022), and by the institutional ethics committee or review board in each country involved in the present study.
Patient Consent Statement
The parent/guardian consent was obtained in countries where parental consent was required for a certain age. In other countries, informed consent was obtained and the sample included only adolescents who are free to consent to research participation according to domestic legislation (for example, in the Netherlands and Serbia, adolescents are free to consent to research participation with 16 and 15 years, respectively).
Competing interests
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jovanović, V., Adams, S., Aritio-Solana, R. et al. Positive and Negative Emotional Experiences in Adolescents across 32 Countries: Cross-National and Gender Differences. Applied Research Quality Life (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-025-10486-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-025-10486-2